For planners and decision-makers, DH represents more than just a heating option—it is a strategic tool to stabilize energy prices, unlock new investments, and future-proof urban infrastructure. This article outlines the key advantages of DH across technical, economic, environmental, and societal dimensions, highlighting why it deserves a central role in energy and climate strategies. General benefits of district heating DH can harness heat from multiple sources: surplus industrial heat, combined heat and power (CHP) plants, waste-to- energy facilities, and renewable sources such as solar thermal. Heat sources can be categorized into high-grade (higher temperature) and low-grade (lower temperature) depending on their usability. Compared to individual systems, DH provides utilization of these resources. While network heat losses exist, the overall benefits outweigh this disadvantage. In dense urban environments, DH becomes especially competitive and efficient. The system also reduces hidden costs borne by society, such as health and climate damages from pollution. These externalities are rarely priced into individual heating solutions but are mitigated when surplus or renewable heat is used collectively. Energy efficiency and resource savings Combined Heat and Power (CHP) CHP plants generate both electricity and heat simultaneously, making them significantly more fuel-efficient compared to separate production. A CHP plant may consume slightly more fuel than a power-only plant, but the captured heat eliminates the need for cooling systems and provides heating for buildings. In urban areas where individual boilers are replaced by a CHP-based DH network, total fuel savings of 30–40% are achievable. These savings benefit both consumers who enjoy lower heating costs and electricity producers who gain higher profitability and competitiveness, as well as the society which saves resources. Surplus and ambient heat Industrial processes, waste incineration, and cooling systems often produce large amounts of excess heat that would otherwise be wasted. DH networks can capture and redistribute this energy, reducing the demand for additional fuel-based production. This not only cuts emissions but also avoids unnecessary investments in new energy infrastructure. Surplus heat is generally cheaper than fuel-based heating, which lowers consumer costs and offers revenue opportunities to industries that supply the excess heat. Efficiency of district heating technology Centralized technologies typically outperform small-scale individual systems: Large boilers in DH networks achieve around 5-10% higher efficiency due to advanced flue gas condensation systems. While they are often used for peak load or reserve capacity,
they benefit from reduced maintenance costs compared to managing many individual boilers.
Large-scale heat pumps are often more efficient than individual heat pumps, particularly when they use waste heat sources with higher temperatures than ambient air. Including network losses, DH-based heat pumps generally remain more efficient overall. Cost comparison: Per kilowatt of heating capacity, DH boilers and heat pumps are almost twice as cost-effective to install compared to individual units. Capacity optimization Avoiding oversizing Individual heating systems must be dimensioned to meet the maximum expected load on the coldest days, which often results in oversizing. DH, however, benefits from demand diversity: not all buildings peak at the same time. With thermal storage and strategic temperature adjustments, the total investments needed are 30–40% lower than the sum of individual solutions. Figure 1 shows an example of this from the city of Viborg in Denmark.
1.600 houses of 6,25kW 10 MW effect from individual heat pumps
Simultaneity factor: 0,62 (for homes): 6,2 MW effect from large scale renewable sources
Cost effect: Large heat pump investment costs 50% per MW compared to individual heatpumps. (Total cost reduction 31% of individual heat pumps)
Figure 1: Simultaneity effect/factor (Investment costs). Source: Tom Diget, Viborg Varme
Classic design principle Investment costs can be reduced by installing base-load capacity covering 70-80% of demand and using cheaper boilers for peak demand. Storage further reduces the need for oversized capacity by decoupling production from consumption. Combining technologies Integrating multiple technologies (e.g., gas-fired CHP and electric heat pumps) enables operators to select the most economical option depending on real-time energy prices. For example, CHP is optimal when electricity prices are high, while heat pumps are more efficient when electricity prices are low.
This flexibility becomes even more valuable as renewable electricity from wind and solar increases market volatility.
11 www.dbdh.dk
Powered by FlippingBook